Correct Supreme Court Ruling in Favor of Ricci and Firefighters vs. City of New Haven by only a 5 to 4 Margin is Concerning

Yesterday in our post, we cheered the Supreme Court correct verdict in favor of Ricci and the Firefighters versus the City of New Haven. We also noted that this case was unequivocally a blatant and abhorrent example of reverse discrimination in order to allow the city of New Haven to realize greater ethnic “diversity” in its member firefighters. It egregiously abridged the rights of a group of individuals (largely White) who were more qualified and scored better on the test but did not have the correct ethnicity yet was overturned by only a 5 to 4 margin. We may not be so lucky in the future if Sonia Sotomayor, Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court justice vacancy and whose decision the Supreme Court overturned, is confirmed. Her decisions, opinions, speeches and background are replete with “ethnic empathy” where some people (specific minority groups) have and will be afforded more rights and leeway than others.

Read George Will’s editorial on this verdict: Four Justices Unable To See Beyond Race

Posted in Diversity policies Fourteenth Amendment Ideology Legal rights Obama Racism Reverse Racism Sotomayor Supreme Court with No Comments

More:

Supreme Court Overturns Sotomayor’s and 2nd U.S. Court of Appeals Decision That Supported Reverse Racism to Implement Diversity Policies

The Supreme Court by a 5 to 4 margin overturned the decision of the 2nd U.S. Court of Appeals that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotamayor rendered and that went against Ricci and the White firefighters in their case versus the City of New Haven. In the surprisingly close ruling, the Supreme Court indicated that these firefighters were unfairly denied promotions because of their race (reverse discrimination) in order for the city of New Haven to implement their diversity plan.
Though the decision was anticipated, what we find shocking is that the vote was only 5 to 4 to reverse the Court of Appeals judgment in a case that was patently was blatantly reverse discrimination by any criteria. This case and the razor thin margin should serve as a clarion call regarding the importance of vehemently opposing the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor. A similar case like this in the future could go the opposite way resulting in the discriminatory abridgement of our rights thus attributing greater inherent rights and equalities to some favored groups or individuals versus others.
Contact your representatives and voice your opposition to Sotomayor being confirmed!

See Video regarding the case and Supreme Court verdict:

Read: Supreme Court rules for white firefighters

Read: Connecticut Firefighters 'Vindicated' by Supreme Court Ruling

Posted in Diversity policies Fourteenth Amendment Ideology Legal rights Reverse Racism Sotomayor Supreme Court Videos with No Comments

More:

Sotomayor Opposed to Death Penalty and Shows Empathy For Criminals, Not Victims

Evidence uncovered from Sotomayor’s past reveals staunch opposition to the death penalty. Some of her reasoning is unequivocally refuted by data readily available to all thus substantiating that ideology for her trumps facts. Furthermore, it also makes quite apparent that she is both naïve and an intellectual lightweight whose empathy will pervert the law to where there will no longer be equal justice for a given crime.
Not surprisingly, like many effete liberals, she attaches greater empathy toward the perpetrator than to the victim and their family. This is not the type of empathy America needs!

Read:  Sotomayor Vs. The Death Penalty

Posted in Fourteenth Amendment Ideology Legal rights Sotomayor Supreme Court with No Comments

More:

GOP Should Take Some Lessons From Their New York Brethren

Americans are getting restive and angry with the bloodless coup we find ourselves in the midst of thanks to the Obama Administration, Pelosi, Reid and other ultra-left Liberals in Congress. In every direction we turn, there are threats to our rights, freedoms and economic well-being. We have ubiquitous taxes and proposals for more taxes. Giving our fair share means taking as much as possible from those who are productive and distributing it to those who are lazy, undeserving or illegally living in this country.

Warp speed to Socialism with consolidation of power and wealth to the Big Brother Government! It is now the proud owner of GM, wants to determine pay for employees of companies even beyond those to whom it has bailed out and gives sweetheart deals to unions while illegally shafting bond holders.
In the legal department, we have a nominee (Sotomayor) that in no uncertain terms states that some individuals are more equal than others, a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. She also has indicated disdain for the First Amendment (Right to Free Speech) and the Second Amendment (Right to Bear Arms) as well. We haven’t yet reviewed her stance on the other Amendments.

We can go on and on enumerating more of these radical changes and confiscatory policies being implemented but you get the point. Meanwhile, where is the opposition, the Republican Party who is supposed to represent and speak out for us? They are a minority party but their influence and presence appears to be microscopic. Perception and appearance is everything and they appear to be a feckless group though this may not necessarily the case. Instead, several passionate, articulate and well-informed Conservatives in the media have effectively taken on the challenges. Like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, Newt Gingrich, Thomas Sowell and many others. Conservatives in America have been active with grassroot organizations and, of course, the Tea Parties.

The Republican Party needs to be more articulate, passionate, aggressive, bold, persistent and omnipresent rather than just polite and trying to be thought of positively by the liberal media. Maybe they should seek inspiration from their New York counterparts who recently staged a coup in their State Senate.

Read: GOP Stages a Coup in New York Senate

Posted in Congress Constitution Democrat Far Left First Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Government Control Legal rights Media - Far Left Nancy Pelosi Obama Personal rights Republican Second Amendment Socialism Sotomayor Supreme Court with No Comments

More:

Sotomayor Has a Long History of Minority Preference and Quotas

The following editorial by Patrick Buchanan provides a more thorough analysis of who Sotamayor really is and her thought processes over time. The findings reveal consistency of attitude and thought over time but in a way that should frighten the average American who wants equal justice and not race based politics and justice (a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment). Though there are a few issues in this editorial that we take exception to, his assessment of Sotomayor is right on.

Read: Obama Crowns A Quota Queen In Sotomayor

Posted in Constitution Fourteenth Amendment Legal rights Personal rights Reverse Racism Sotomayor Supreme Court with No Comments

More:

Sotomayor’s “Empathy” Effectively Repeals the Fourteenth Amendment Which Guarantees Equal Protection of the Laws

In a lucid and convincing fashion, Thomas Sowell delineates the far reaching dangers that Obama’s selection for the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor, presents to the average American and their rights.

Read: Hello Empathy And So Long Equal Justice

Posted in Constitution Fourteenth Amendment Legal rights Obama Personal rights Sotomayor Supreme Court with No Comments

More: