Apr 17

Sen. Rand Paul (R.-KY) Rails Against the “Collective” Omnipotent Federal Government and Urges Protection and Expansion of the Rights, Freedoms and Choices of Individuals

In the following speech in the Senate by Sen. Rand Paul, he rails against a large, omnipotent central government, the "Collective", and instead exhorts Senators to consider the protection and expansion of the rights, freedoms and choices of the individual. He cites Ayn Rand and her prescient novel, "Anthem", in his discussion.


Print This Post Print This Post
Mar 24

Senators Rand Paul, Mike Lee and Jim DeMint Introduce Five-Year Balanced Budget Plan

There are few serious players who are willing to responsibly address our country’s rapidly approaching fiscal apocalypse. Surely this doesn’t include Obama who submitted his 2012 budget with a $1.7 trillion deficit which he claims will help solve our crisis. Oh, and of course, his plan includes similar gargantuan deficits for as far as the eye can see.

The Democrats are outraged at even a $6 billion cut out of $3.65 trillion. This miniscule amount represents approximately 25 hours of federal spending out of an entire year (of 8760 total hours).

Many Republicans are seeking far more in budget cuts, $60 - $200 billion. Unfortunately, these amounts still fall far short of what is needed.

Who are these (brave) individuals who are willing to put everything on the line in order to save our nation from fiscal calamity? They are all Republicans and Conservatives and include such names as Senators Rand Paul, Mike Lee and Jim DeMint and Rep. Paul Ryan.

We need to give them our support as well.

Sen. Rand Paul introduces Five-Year Balanced Budget Plan with Senators Lee and DeMint

Senator Rand Paul unveiled his five-year path to a balanced budget, which includes cutting four federal government departments: Departments of Education, Energy, Commerce and Housing and Urban Development.

The proposal also calls for the repeal of “Obamacare,” leaves entitlements untouched, and he also said he is willing to make changes to the cuts, but there will have to be cuts elsewhere.

Rand Paul said:

“While official Washington is sitting on their hands and ignoring the ever-expanding deficit, I am offering a real plan to rein in spending and address the looming debt crisis. The only way we can balance the budget is if we have real leadership, and the President has abdicated his leadership on this issue. It’s time to take bold action to bring our country back from the brink, and I am proud to start the conversation on how we go about that.”

Via ABC’s The Note:

“There’s a lot of things in here that everybody could agree to, Republicans and Democrats, but nobody’s leading on the president’s side and on our side we felt we needed to put this forward to get the debate started, at the very least.”

“There’s an argument for every federal program up here… Nobody’s coming up here asking me for money that’s not for a good reason. But the alternative is that we get into a point of financial disaster where nobody gets any money,” he said.

Fellow Tea Party Caucus members, Senators Mike Lee and Jim DeMint were by Paul’s side when he introduced this bill. Both men supported Paul and called for Washington to get serious about the budget and to make cuts. The country is in fiscal jeaopardy.

Senator Mike Lee challenged anyone who criticizes Paul’s plan to present something better rather than verbally criticize it.

“There may be some in this town who will disagree with the manner in which we’re proposing moving toward a balanced budget over a five year period. That’s fine, that’s understandable, that’s what this town is about… but to those who may disagree with it, to those who might want to attack it. I would ask that they come up with their own five year plan.”

Senator DeMint echoed Lee and said that balancing the budget may require “letting things go” back to the state level.

“There are functions and departments at the federal level that need to be devolved to the states. Part of balancing the budget is restructuring and devolving federal functions back the states, local communities and people,” he said.

DeMint said he did not agree with “every particular thing in here,” but stressed the importance of balancing the budget.


Print This Post Print This Post
Feb 23

American Government Is Becoming Tyrannical Under Obama

“Contempt for the people and their just laws are the hallmarks of tyranny.”

What an insightful, succinct statement (from the following article)! And also quite apropos for the present.


Because this is what we are witnessing in Washington now unlike any time in our past since the founding of our nation. We have had arrogant, unpleasant Presidents and politicians in the past but they all pale to our present perfect storm of the contemptuous and pathologically narcissistic “president” Obama, Congressional Democrats and the complicit news media (which years ago actually defended the people from the wicked, corrupt politicians).

America is turning into a tyranny and honest, hardworking Americans have become the victims.

This needs to stop or the next solution is a Second American Revolution. Like what has been occurring in Egypt. And against the rest of the Arab autocrats in the Middle East.

Short of this, the Tea Parties are our best hope and so are the brave and increasingly resolute Republicans in Congress, particularly the ones supported by the Tea Parties and the more conservative ones like Rep. Paul Ryan and Sen. Rand Paul.

We must pledge them our support, time and money if we are to save our nation. This will also be for our children, grandchildren and so on.

We must also become politically involved and serve as individual mouthpieces for freedom and small government.

Or we will become slaves by proxy of a corrupt, disdainful and omnipotent Big Brother Central Government.

This must never happen!

Thus Ever Are Tyrants
Jim Mahoney  February 19, 2011

Contempt for the people and their just laws are the hallmarks of tyranny.  When the tyrant looks out upon the masses he bestrides, he doesn't see people; he sees objects to be manipulated, mulcted and molested.  The sacred trust binding the people and their government means nothing to the tyrant.  At best, it's merely an obstacle to his objective.

Because he has no kinship with the people, he feels as free to poach and plunder them as any other criminal.  Having the power of the state at his disposal there is no limit to his predation.

A free people, recognizing that the tyrant reflects the corrupt state of all men, wisely hem in their governments with rules.  Wherever possible they diffuse power away from individuals.  Separation of powers, like the rest of our Constitution, reflects a wise suspicion of fallen human nature.

Only people who acknowledge man's inherent corruption as an immutable truth will ever be free.  Only people humble enough to recognize their own failings will ever accept restraint.  Consequently, these are the only people who will ever voluntarily submit themselves to the rule of law.   They are also the only people fit to lead a free society.

A tyrant, on the other hand, is as sure of his own perfection as he is certain that no limits apply to him.  No law will ever contain him.  If a people are to remain free, their only hope is to keep him away from power.

Perhaps this is why, when Ben Franklin emerged from the constitutional convention in 1787, he famously told the woman that the delegates gave birth to a "republic, if you can keep it."  Understanding human nature as well as he did, his wisdom may have given him a glimpse into the future.  Sadly, for much of the following two centuries, Americans failed miserably to meet to his challenge.

Today, America's elite culture is a squalid sludge of contempt.  It is the perfect media for breeding tyrants.  As with other forms of rot, our tyranny grew and developed unnoticed.  The sudden rise of the Tea Party is akin to a man awakening to realize he has been feeding the termites threatening to collapse his home.

Stampeded by a series of shocking events, followed by a flurry of dubious laws justified by hazy reasoning, frightened Americans allowed tyranny to grow unchecked at a blistering rate.  The freedoms we enjoyed a scant 15 years ago are now a dim memory.  Today we meekly submit to laws permitting sneak and peak searches, no knock warrants, and high tech invasions of our persons that would turn any Red commissar green with envy.

Does anyone remember that just 15 years ago Americans were free to travel in their own country without showing identity papers?    Does anyone seriously think these intrusions will stop growing on their own?

Sadly they are all transgressions that anyone reading the Constitution can plainly see are forbidden.  Yet somehow in the sludge of the elite mind they are justified: destroying our freedom is necessary to protect "freedom".  Battered daily with messages of panic and despair, the land of the free and home of the brave has been transformed something different altogether.

Every one of these abuses arises from a fundamental contempt for free people and the rule of law that protects us.  They are only a sample from a shamefully long list.

Consider:  we have a President who, for whatever reason, defies demonstrating his Constitutional qualification to hold his office.  Whether or not he is qualified is practically irrelevant compared to the damage his intransigence has done to our Constitution and rule of law.  By tolerating his obstinacy, Americans forever waive their right to demand evidence that a future president be American born.  Let your imagination run with the possibilities.

Think it's farfetched?

Consider:  the most fearsome power of the Federal government is to make war.  The Constitution assigns specific responsibilities to Congress and the Executive to declare and execute war.  It is a thorny and arduous process.  It's supposed to be.  It's intended as a barrier against gratuitous death.

Yet the last constitutionally declared war ended in 1945.  Since then, hundreds of thousands of Americans have been killed or maimed and millions slaughtered across the globe at the whim of a single man, defying or, at best finessing, the Constitutional obligation of Congress to declare war.

Protestors may howl about this president or that war.  However, no one gives a thought to the brazen assault that undeclared, unconstitutional wars represent to the American people and our Republic.  After 65 years of blind submission to this tyranny, why would the thought occur to anyone?

Does anybody seriously think there will ever be another constitutionally declared war?  That protection's gone the way of the Whigs.

As bad as destroying our financial lives is, once Americans accepted sacrificing our young in this manner, it was only a matter of time before our emboldened "leaders" came for the rest of the loot.

Here is a documentary film showing the price today's brave young Americans and our Afghan "beneficiaries" are paying for no more reason than our President found himself impaled on his own talking points.  As a result, another generation gets to pursue the deadly chimera of "hearts and minds" for no greater purpose than to pull the President's foot from his mouth.

Worse, while such horrors proceed in his name, the greatest pain this man experiences holding office is losing his privacy!  Would we expect less compassion from George III?

The rise of the Tea Party is a grass-roots recognition that our liberty is too precious to leave to a dull priesthood of politicians and pundits.  The finest Constitution on earth is just a piece of paper if the people it protects aren't prepared to enforce it.  The mass rising of the populace embodied in the Tea Parties is an unprecedented threat to our budding dictators.  It's no surprise their empire struck back with every lame insult its muddled minds could muster.

In their own way, the transparent calumnies hurled at Americans demanding the government obey our laws are comforting.  If that's the best the elites have, perhaps many of the other walls they've built around us are equally flimsy.

Still, we are on the threshold of losing our Republic.  As with other life threatening situations, admitting the problem is the first step:  America, we have a tyranny!  However, judging by the panicked response of the elites, we still have the means to thwart it.  Demanding the government and its officials abide by the Constitution they are sworn to uphold and defend is our best hope.

Enforcing the demands is uncomfortable.  They tyrant has many minions, conscious and otherwise.  It's important to recognize that even those who proclaim themselves our friends can be as dangerous as our adversaries.  Whether it's the Panjandrum of Fairness and Balance or the eye of the Peacock that alters all, those who ridicule the just concerns of the public are themselves the forces of darkness and ignorance.

Their conduct reveals their allegiance.


Print This Post Print This Post
Jan 30

More Details On Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) To Reduce the Federal Government’s Annual Spending

We posted Sen. Rand Paul’s response to Obama’s State of the Union Address (Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) Brilliant Response to Obama’s State of the Union Address) on Jan 27. Below are more details of his plan to substantially downsize the federal government and with it, reduce expenditures by around $500 billion annually.

Rand Paul gets serious about the deficit
Joseph Smith  1/27/11

The President pretends to cut spending and the Republicans offer serious proposals, but Rand Paul has raised the bar on reducing the size of government.

Politico reports that Senator Paul (R-Kent.) has introduced a bill that would cut spending by $500 billion in one year:
...he clearly goes much further, folding the Energy Department into the Department of Defense and wiping out most of the Education Department but for Pell Grants to low income college students.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is a third casualty, together with seven independent agencies including the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and national endowments for the humanities and arts.

Senator Paul's legislation would reduce spending across a wide range of federal departments, as detailed in an overview of the bill.

As an example, The EPA's quixotic quest to save the world from carbon dioxide is made possible by an EPA budget of $11.2 billion, which the Paul legislation would reduce by $3.2 billion, or 29%.

Departments targeted for larger reductions include Agriculture, Defense, HHS, Homeland Security and State.  The general idea is to roll spending back to 2008 levels and eliminate wasteful programs.

Mr. Paul, the tea party stalwart, has posted his view on the stakes in this game, a game that is not for the faint of heart, nor, apparently, for this President.

The President's plan to "freeze" discretionary spending for five years would merely lock these bloated bureaucracies in place, where they can continue pillaging economic prosperity in perpetuity.

Rand Paul has set the bar beyond the reach of liberal minds, but it ultimately must be raised higher still if we are to tame the government beast.


Print This Post Print This Post
Jan 27

Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) Brilliant Response to Obama’s State of the Union Address

Sen. Rand Paul delivered a brilliant and trenchant analysis following Obama’s State of the Union. He incisively reviewed the failed policies and ideologies of Obama and the Democrats, the immediate need to radically change course and then offers alternatives and approaches. This eloquent response also serves as an introduction to his plan to cut $500 billion of government spending in the upcoming year as just the beginning of a serious and concerted effort to permanently rein in spending and regain fiscal responsibility.

This is a must see (and hear).


Print This Post Print This Post